|
The Similarities Between
Non-Formal Education
and Early Childhood Education
Wendy M. Rich-Orloff
American University
When one hears the term “Non-Formal Education” (NFE), what comes to
mind? Does the person think of Paulo Freire? Empowering the poor?
Supporting communities to become self-sufficient? Expanding the
accessibility of educational opportunities? Health or gender issues?
Political revolution? All of these areas have in some way been
associated with NFE. This paper, though, looks at NFE from a different perspective. In many
ways the principles and techniques of NFE are very similar to early
childhood education (ECE). After defining both NFE and ECE and their
respective principles and techniques, we will then compare the two and
see what similarities we find. The High/Scope Curriculum will be used
as a case study to see NFE principles in practice in an ECE setting.
Non-Formal Education
Non-Formal Education can best
be described as "any organized, systematic educational activity
carried on outside the framework of the formal system to provide
selected types of learning to particular subgroups in the
population, adults as well as children” (La Belle, 1986, p.2). What
does this definition really mean, and how does it relate to a
classroom environment? La Belle continues, "[The] teaching/learning
process must be ‘organized, a systematic educational activity' and …
'outside the framework of the formal system'" (p.6). Activities must
be planned so they are natural social interactions. Learning is not
forced, but rather is an extension of interacting with materials and
people. Outside the framework means there are no grades, mandated
curriculum, certificates or diplomas. NFE can be either externally directed
and/or self-initiated, with stress on the connection between what's
been learned with how to mobilize resources. This view sees local
development programs holistically from many perspectives including
the individual, the community, those in power, and those who can
help.
There are four assumptions of adult
education that effect NFE. These assumptions are:
-
Adults desire and
utilize self-directedness.
-
Adults' experiences are
a rich resource for learning. Adults learn through
experiential techniques (learn by doing), discussion, and/or
problem solving.
-
Adults are aware of
their personal learning needs from real life tasks or problems.
-
Adults are
competency-based learners, and want to apply what they have
learned to their own life. (Brookfield, 1991, p. 92)
The task of the
teacher or facilitator is to create a program and setting where
adult learners can develop self-directed learning skills.
A well-known
proponent of NFE is Paulo Freire. During the 1960s he was very
involved in the plight of the poor in Latin America, and concluded
that education was the best way to address inequalities. Since
formal education was not addressing these issues, Freire advocated
NFE as a way to raise awareness and consciousness of the situation,
and to empower the poor to take more control over their lives.
Freire felt that critical consciousness would address the issues.
Through dialogues that addressed both problems and their underlying
causes, and the critical reflection of these dialogues, the poor
would learn to no longer blame themselves. Future actions, often
political, were identified to help support the poor (Ewert, 1989).
Freire decided to call this process praxis – the concept of
action yielding reflection, which would yield more action. The
beginning action would be the dialogues, and from the reflections of
those dialogues further action would be identified. This process
increased the participants’ self-esteem, and gave them hope.
Paulo Freire felt
it was not possible to split theory from practice; learners must be
given the space and freedom to develop their own theories. According
to Freire, a “top down” transfer of knowledge from the teacher to
the student doesn't work; people's involvement in the creation of
their own knowledge through struggling with the concepts is the key
to ensuring a proper learning process (PLA Notes, 1998). Key lessons
from Freire included:
-
Everyone has the capacity and right
to learn.
-
Education can either help empower or
maintain the status quo.
-
To be liberating, the educational
process should be participatory.
-
Knowledge should not be fed to the
participants; the environment should be created so they can
explore, analyze, and synthesize.
-
Education yields participation,
which in turn yields liberation.
-
Liberation is the process of
transforming oneself and creating a new society.
-
Changes are to occur in both
individual behavior and social power relations. (PLA Notes, 1998,
p. 122)
Teachers should
not teach answers, but instead create an environment so participants
can analyze, reflect and create new learning (PLA Notes, 1998).
Freire encouraged the development of ideas within a social context.
Themes such as health care, gender issues, and/or social equality
were presented in ways that might generate discussion. While the
themes were presented, a solution was not; the goal of the program
is for participants to engage in their own problem posing and
problem-solving.
Freire identified three levels of
thought (Shor, 1993). These included:
-
Intransitive
thought – This is the lowest stage, where people are the most
dominated. People live fatalistically, believing that their
fate is out of their
hands.
-
Semi-transitive
- People exercise some thought and action or change.
-
Critical
transitivity – The highest development of thought and action; people
think
holistically and critically (pp. 32-33).
Freire hoped that
while people most likely entered NFE development courses thinking
intransitively, they would be challenged in their thinking and
therefore leave the program viewing their situation critically and
actively.
Another theorist
who has used NFE in his work is Miles Horton. His program Highlander
specializes in working with adults and union organizations to help
empower the everyday poor worker. "I have a holistic view of the
educative process... The educative process must be organic, and not
an assortment of unrelated methods and ideas” (Horton, 1990, p.
130). Horton believed that as an adult educator, the program needed
to flow from the participant’s interests and concerns. "You have to
start where people are, because their growth is going to be from
there, not from some abstraction or where you are or someone else
is" (Horton, p. 131). According to Horton, participants know the
basic answers to their questions, but in order for them to go
further, adult teachers need to ask questions and stimulate
thinking, thru discussion, for them to go beyond their immediate
experience. This building on personal experience is the basis for
future learning. Providing adult learners with opportunities to
learn for themselves by making decisions will also help teach them
the concepts of social equality and freedom of speech (Horton,
1990). For NFE to be appropriate for adult learners, there should
be a “down-up” approach rather than a “top-down” approach. Begin by
learning what people perceive their own problems to be, and then
build on that. Theories should be molded into the practice rather
than forcing practices to fit theories.
According
to Ewert (1989), NFE can be used for a variety of purposes: to
increase literacy among adults; mobilize the poor and marginalized
for empowerment; as a grass-roots movement focusing on society's
underlying structural problems; or as community-based development,
focusing on health and agriculture that brings knowledge to the
people so they can practice for themselves. NFE’s goal is to train
locals to continue training others. NFE stresses the integrated
development of health, agriculture, and political action at the
local level (Ewert, 1989). Ewert identified the following themes of
NFE in development: process instead of projects, NFE as an
empowering process, participation, and a rise in voluntary
initiatives (p.94).
Another
major contributor to the field of adult education is Malcolm
Knowles. Knowles felt “that adults possess … experiences that affect
how they perceive the world, and [these experiences should be a]
source … for curriculum development and learning activities”
(Brookfield, 1991, p. 98). The most significant form of adult
learning is critical reflection, interpretation, and exchange of
experiences.
Knowles
defines the differences between the pedagogical model (school age
learning) and the andragogical model (adult learning). There are
seven components of adult learning (andragogy):
-
The physical and
psychological environment should be conducive to learning. (Circular seating, mutual respect, trust).
-
Involve learners in the
mutual planning of methods and curricular decisions.
-
Involve learners in
diagnosing their learning needs.
-
Encourage learners to
formulate their own learning objectives.
-
Help learners identify
resources and come up with strategies for using these resources to achieve their own objectives.
-
Help learners carry out
learning plans.
-
Help learners evaluate
their learning. (Brookfield, 1991, pg. 102).
This set of
assumptions about how adults learn impact how an adult education
program should be run. Within an adult education program, learning
should be self-directed, since adults are capable of taking
responsibility for themselves. There should be a variety of
experiences. Adults should be seen as a rich resource for each
other. Individualized learning plans and/or learning contracts
should be encouraged to focus on individualized needs. Adult
learners are assumed to be motivated to learn. A life-centered,
task-centered, or problem-centered approach to learning would be
most appropriate. How relevant the subject matter is to the
learner’s life is very important; motivations to learn are then more
internalized (Knowles, 1985).
To address this
type of program design, the teacher should be seen as a facilitator.
The facilitator’s role includes mutual planning with the learners.
This would involve supporting the participants in diagnosing their
own needs, formulating learning objectives, designing learning
plans, and evaluating their learning. Facilitators would also be
expected to help participants carry out their learning plans
(Knowles, 1985).
In
comparison, the pedagogical model for school aged children is very
different. Within this model, everything is pre-planned; the teacher
has full responsibility and the student is seen as a passive
learner. The teacher and administration make all decisions, with
little to no input from the students. Students have little
experience and rely on teachers, textbooks, and materials for the
information to be “fed” to them. Students must learn what they are
told to learn in order to get to the next grade level. Activities
are subject-centered, and learning is seen as a process to learn the
subject mater content. Motivation to learn comes from external
factors - parents, teachers, competition for grades, consequences
for failure, etc. (Knowles, 1985, pp. 8-9). To address the
pedagogical program design, Knowles (pp.13-14) asks four questions:
What content needs to be covered? How can it be organized into
manageable units? What would be the logical sequence of those units?
What would be the best way to present the content?
Both
Freire and Knowles agree that facilitators should not participate in
banking education, where students are viewed as empty containers
waiting to be filled with the teacher’s knowledge. Education should
be participatory, with the teacher as a critical problem-poser,
asking thought-provoking questions and encouraging students to ask
questions as well. "Students [should] experience education as
something they do, not as something done to them" (Shor, 1993, p.
26). When teaching in a problem-posing style, educational materials
should be integrated into the students' lives and thoughts (Shor,
1993). In return, students learn to question and evaluate life
instead of just walking through it.
An
understanding of the theories of NFE does an educator little good,
however, unless an educator knows how to implement its components in
the classroom. NFE is recognizing the strengths of the learners -
all can learn and contribute to the program. To make the program
relevant, learning materials should be used which portray life
familiarly and reflect the participants' reality. The program
should foster the self-esteem and self-confidence of the
participants, and encourage them to make choices, solve problems,
and look at different options (Boudin, 1993).
Non-Formal Education programs which have been recognized as
successful have the following in common:
-
Small, local beginnings
and slow, decentralized growth.
-
Involvement of local
people (esp. the poor) in each phase of the program.
-
An approach that views
planning as a "learning process".
-
Leaders whose first
responsibility is to the poor.
-
Recognition that good
health can only be attained through helping the poor
improve the entire situation in which they live. (Werner &
Bower, 1982, p.1).
The way the group
leader teaches can either break down or build up the self-confidence
and community strength of the group members. "Good teaching is the
art, not of PUTTING IDEAS INTO people's heads, but of DRAWING IDEAS
OUT" (Werner & Bower, 1982, p. 1-16). Experience leads to practice,
which yields an understanding of why. "Critical thinking begins when
people make the connections between their individual lives and the
social conditions around them" (Ahern, p. 6).
Participation is
defined when learners actively reflect on their own lives, assess
their own and/or the group’s needs, and participate in coming up
with answers. "The fundamental basis of all human learning is rooted
in the complex web of relationships that exist between a person and
his/her environment" (Bopp, 1994, p. 24). Participation is integral
to learning and human development. One learns, grows, and develops
through directly interacting with and reflecting upon the world
around them (Bopp, 1994).
Common features
of popular education projects include a political and social
analysis of the poor and their problems, and engaging them in both
individual and group discussions to increase their awareness of the
situation. Educational practices are based on previous experiences
and group work. Concrete skills and abilities are focused on, with
the goal to increase pride, dignity, confidence, and self-reliance
(Torres, 1990).
Teaching in the
NFE methodology means teaching students to think. Programs are most
effective when they are in the context of real problem-solving.
Teachers should demonstrate and model the process of solving a
problem by urging students to talk out loud as the steps of a
problem are gone through. Real discussions about real concerns teach
thinking skills and how to look at all perspectives (Cromley, 2000).
Adult leaders should teach for understanding; this deeper
understanding will help adults transfer their knowledge to other
situations.
A person’s
mental model is shorthand for experience. This affects how we
understand what we see and hear (Cromley, 2000). The mental model
helps organize information, sets up expectations, remembers things
associated with specific objects, organizes background knowledge,
and provides problem-solving shortcuts. Mental models are based on
prior knowledge. This is why teachers should be encouraged to
identify their students' prior knowledge; it will help show the
teacher how to mesh what the students already know and what they are
learning (Cromley, 2000). When adults learn for understanding and
meaning, knowledge will transfer to one’s memory more effectively.
This also helps learners build their own mental models rather than
accept those of others.
Memory is the
process of putting information into storage and then retrieving it
later. Information is remembered better when more than one sense is
used to process the information. This creates many paths in the
brain to be utilized as the knowledge is being processed, so it will
be easier to remember later (Cromley, 2000). To learn anything, a
student needs to associate it to something he/she already knows.
Thinking develops in stage-like sequences, but there are no absolute
stages at specific ages. Thinking develops from familiar to less
familiar. According to Cromley, the differences between child
learners and adult learners are how memories, interests, life
experiences, and background knowledge impact on one’s ability to
relate to the topics being discussed.
Active
Learning is a process in which participants are allowed to
figure things out for themselves and participate in discussions,
activities, and projects. According to Cromley (2000), active
learning benefits participants cognitively and philosophically:
cognitively, because students will have difficulty remembering
information unless they are encouraged and supported to use their
new knowledge, and philosophically, because the goal of education
(and active learning) is to create independent thinkers.
Participants also pay more attention and will be encouraged to do
their best when they are interested and involved. Active learning
includes a problem-based approach – using real world problems that
students are interested in and that draws on their skills and
knowledge. These problems have no simple answers, and they are
explored in groups of students working together (Cromley, 2000).
Problems create a “need to know”, and engages participants in the
program.
Real motivation
is encouraged when students learn for understanding, using topics
that students are interested in, making real-world learning relevant
to life experiences, providing real choices, working with others,
and when teachers are involved (Cromley, 2000). If a teacher
complains that s/he has trouble motivating a learner, it could be
because that person has not connected to the learner’s interests.
NFE also uses
some specific techniques to address these issues. One way to address
participants’ concerns is through participatory research.
This involves the participants identifying their own problems,
working out options, creating a plan, and organizing how to
accomplish their plan (Kane, 2001). Steps include: identify the
problems; come up with possible solutions; assess these solutions;
create an action plan; mobilize for action; monitor and evaluate the
results. Participants should learn from any errors they might make
and share the lessons they have learned with other members of the
program. The important thing to remember is to let them do
it.
Participatory
Learning and Action (PLA) offers techniques and activities that can
be used within the NFE context. Some examples include:
- Mapping and
modeling
- Diagrams
- Seasonal
calendar/timetable
- Learn by doing
- Stories
- Case studies
- Proverbs
- Pie chart
- Matrices
All of these
techniques are activities that participants engage in. The charts,
maps, and diagrams are often completed on the ground, using moveable
symbols. This increases participation, is more comfortable for
participants, and supports participants if they feel a need to
change their minds about how they have recorded information – the
recordings are not permanent, and the participants don’t have to
worry about “redoing” the activity. Symbols and pictures are used to
record their thoughts and answers, to encourage participation
whether one is literate or illiterate.
Other materials
which can be used in adult training sessions include flash cards,
flannel boards, teaching aids, real materials, games, puzzles,
pictures, photos, drawings, story telling, picture books, role
playing, theater, puppet shows, critical discussions and
reflections, comic books, radio, and television. Greater varieties
of mediums used will help gain participants’ interests and
involvement. These activities help the participants make sense of
the situations they are in, and help them see possible solutions to
their problems.
To summarize, the
main points of NFE are seeing, thinking, doing. The human
mind is a muscle; while it grows stronger with use, it also can get
weaker when not used.
Early Childhood
Education
Early
Childhood Education (ECE) is often considered a sub-set of NFE,
because it is not like the pedagogical method of education for
school-aged children. ECE focuses on how young children benefit from
early educational experiences that will prepare them for school both
cognitively and socially in later years. These educational programs
are for young children, most commonly between the ages of 3-5
(though sometimes 2-year-olds are included in this category and have
their own developmentally appropriate program).
Jean
Piaget is considered one of the main theorists who have contributed
a great deal to ECE. Piaget’s theories are based on the observations
that preschoolers actively explore with their bodies and senses to
gain information about the world. Piaget theorized that there are
predictable stages of cognitive development, and all children follow
this outline - though at their own pace. Children adapt and process
information two ways – through assimilation (processing information
in such a way that it is compatible with the child’s current
understanding of the world), and by accommodation (processing
information and changing or developing a new way of understanding
something) (Dworetzky, 1990). Piaget created a simple chart to
describe these cognitive stages that all children participate in.
Sensorimotor Period (0-2 years)
-
Stage 1, Reflex Activity (0-1
month): Natural reflexes become less awkward.
-
Stage 2, Self-Investigation (1-4
months): Infant explores his/her own body.
-
Stage 3, Coordination And Reaching
Out (4-8 months): Infant tries to reach objects other than his/her
own body.
-
Stage 4, Goal-Directed Behavior
(8-12 months): Behaviors become more purposeful in order to try
and reach a goal. Sequences of actions are combined to accomplish
something. Children begin to search for something that is out of
sight, though not consistently.
-
Stage 5, Experimentation (12-18
months): Toddlers actively experiment to see cause-effect
relationships.
-
Stage 6, Problem Solving And Mental
Combinations (18-24 months): Toddlers develop a full understanding
that things exist even if not in sight.
Object
Permanence - understanding that even if something is out of
sight, it still exists.
Preoperational Period (2-7 years)
-
Preconceptual Stage (2-4 years):
Young children begin to develop concepts and understand
relationships.
-
Syncretic Reasoning - immature way
of sorting and classifying, not fully developed.
-
Transductive Reasoning - drawing
inference about relationship between objects based on one
attribute.
-
Animistic Thinking - inanimate
objects are alive.
-
Intuitive Stage (4-7 years):
Children’s beliefs are based on what they sense is true, not on
logic or rational thought.
Period of
Concrete Operations (7-11 years)
-
Conservation: Understanding that the
amount of something does not change unless something is added or
taken away from it, even if the container changes shape.
-
Reversibility: The ability to think
back and reverse steps in the mind, thinking about what just did.
-
Seriation: The ability to place
items, thoughts, stages in correct sequence.
-
Classification: To organize into
many different classes of objects, and subclasses.
-
Numeration: The sequence of numbers,
and how they can be grouped.
Period of
Formal Operations (11+ years)
-
Children can apply logical rules to
situations and can form hypothesis.
(Dworetzky, 1990; Abraham, Morris, & Wald, 1993)
Aside from
cognition, areas of development that ECE focuses on also include
language (expressive and receptive), motor (gross or large muscles
and fine or small muscles), personal-social, and adaptive
(self-help) skills. Other theorists have also contributed to our
understanding of early childhood development, including Stanley
Greenspan and Erik Erikson, whom studied children’s social
development. Five “building blocks” have been identified for
social development: trust; autonomy (the capacity for independence
and exploration); initiative (begin and follow through with a task);
empathy (understand feelings of others); and self-esteem (Brickman &
Taylor, 1991, pp. 16-17). According to Lauter-Klatell
(1991), Greenspan points out that
development consists of continuous growth. He
identified 6 stages of social-emotional development:
-
Self-regulation and interest in the world (0-3 months). Children
are learning to become calm regardless of the amount of
stimulation around him/her.
- Falling in
love (2-7 months). He/she is showing interest in those around
him/her, especially the main caregiver.
- Development of
intentional communication (3-10 months). The child can begin to
express emotion and expression in response to another.
- Emergence of
an organized sense of self (9-18 months). He/she initiates more
interactions, knows how to get others to react.
- Creation of
emotional ideas (18 to 36 months). The child is displaying object
permanence and beginning to imagine.
- Emotional
thinking: The basis for fantasy, reality, and self-esteem (30-48
months). He/she begins to understand how emotions work, and has a
better understanding of the world. (Dworetzky, 1990, pp. 163-168)
These stages help
parents and teachers understand the emotions of the child more
clearly, and how they can help support the child’s emotional growth.
Erik Erikson also created
developmental stages that he felt all children progress through. The
difference is that Erikson studied a person’s psychosocial
development from infancy all the way into adulthood and to the end
of life. These Psychosocial Stages include:
- Basic trust
vs. Mistrust (infancy): The child develops trust that the
caregiver will meet his/her needs and be caring and nurturing.
- Autonomy vs.
Shame or doubt (1-3 years): The child is beginning independence;
if the child learns that it is wrong to attempt independence,
he/she will develop shame and doubt.
- Initiative Vs.
Guilt (3- 5 ½): S/he initiates actions on his/her own; if
successful or attempts are accepted, then guilt is avoided.
- Industry Vs.
Inferiority (5 ½ - 12 years): The child learns to feel competent
in what he/she does; failure leads to inferiority.
- Identity vs.
Role confusion (adolescence): The child develops a sense of
identity with family and peers, and begins to think about what
he/she wants to do.
- Intimacy Vs.
Isolation (early adulthood): Close relationships and intimacy are
formed with others.
- Generativity
Vs. Stagnation (middle adulthood): The adult is content with
family life and work.
- Ego Integrity
Vs. Despair (later adulthood): As one reviews one’s life as
thoughts of death approaches, is the person satisfied or upset? (Dworetzky,
1990, p. 344)
The implications
of this set of stages shows how an unresolved issue in an earlier
stage can impact a person in later life. Erikson felt that a person
would only move to the next stage of development if they
successfully and healthfully complete the current stage one is in.
Other
theorists have also contributed to early childhood development.
Howard Gardner has hypothesized that there are seven areas of
intelligence which people (children and adults) can be accomplished
in. Intelligence is not just language and math, but also music,
kinesthetics, spatial, interpersonal and intrapersonal relations
(Scherer, 1991, p. 21). This impacts education by increasing the
opportunities that teachers can provide for their students. B. F.
Skinner (1991) has stressed that the environment is the source of
all learning.
How do
these theorists impact ECE teachers? Teachers are seen as supporters
of development, with active learning necessary for a child’s
cognitive development. Supporting a child’s core understanding
allows new knowledge to be built (Hohmann, Banet, & Weikart, 1979,
p.3). In other words, ECE provides a strong foundation that will
support future learning. Natural communication between children and
adults and between children will strengthen and extend language
development. A teacher's questioning and planning methods increase
children's exploration and self-discovery (Brickman & Taylor, 1991).
How does a
teacher support all these stages of development in the classroom?
What common principles and techniques are implemented? The main
focus in ECE is the child’s growth in the domains of cognitive,
language, physical, and interpersonal development (Abraham, Morris,
& Wald, 1993, p.ix). A holistic approach is used, focusing on the
following goals: to foster confidence as learners; encourage active
participation; promote an ability to understand and appreciate
others; encourage meaningful relationships with others; and to
promote a mastery of skills and knowledge for later school success.
Young children learn through active exploration; they construct
knowledge from personal experiences.
A
child-initiated, child-directed, teacher-supported play is part of
Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP). What defines DAP is
whether a program or activity is both age-appropriate (appropriate
for the child’s chronological age, so expectations are not too high
and inappropriate) and individually appropriate (the recognition
that each child is unique and develops at his/her own pace, at an
individual timing and pattern of growth). All experiences should
match the developmental abilities of the children involved (Bredekamp,
1987). When DAP is followed, all areas are integrated in a holistic
approach, based on the developmental milestones. Young children
learn by doing; learning results from the interaction of children's
own thinking and their experiences in the world (Bredekamp, 1987).
Young children acquire knowledge through playful interaction with
objects and people; teachers of young children are their
facilitators or guides. They prepare the environment to provide
stimulating, challenging materials and activities. Teachers observe
and then pose additional challenges to push children’s thinking
further.
The ECE
curriculum provides for all areas of development. Planning should be
based on the children's interests and progress and emphasize
learning as interactive. Learning activities and materials should be
real, concrete, and relevant to young children. Teachers should
strive to meet the needs of all children, even if they are
considered "outside" the normal developmental range. A variety of
materials and activities should be available for the children’s use.
Teachers should gradually increase the difficulty and challenge for
each child as appropriate; teachers should also provide
opportunities for children to choose and actively explore within the
daily program. Teachers should ask questions or make suggestions to
stimulate thinking (Bredekamp, 1987).
Themes
chosen should focus on topics, subjects, and/or experiences that are
of high interest to each specific group of children. The focus
should be on the content of children's immediate lives and
experiences (Abraham, Morris, & Wald, 1993). Activities that
simulate life outside the classroom are incorporated into each theme
to allow children to see relationships between him/herself and other
people, objects, and events (Abraham et al.1993).
The role
of teacher is to be a link between the children and the curriculum.
The teacher is facilitator, supporting and helping children work and
play together, exploring the environment, discovering and practicing
strategies. The teacher is also a bridge between home and school
(Abraham et al. 1993).
Facilitation techniques encompass all areas of development. For
example, there is no set time to teach language; it is taught within
related context. Feedback and positive reinforcement are used as
natural consequences. Language is most effectively learned in a
naturalistic social context. Both adult-child and child-child
interactions provide natural teaching opportunities. Techniques
include: wait time, eye contact, modeling, narration, repetition of
key concepts, expansion, prompting for word retrieval, and
open-ended questions (Abraham et al.1993, pg. 88-92).
A
positive self-concept is nurtured in an environment that
unconditionally accepts each child and offers opportunities for
success. Assigning children responsibilities (or “jobs”) teaches
them that they are able and responsible. The teacher facilitates
play by modeling; joining in children's play at their level;
structuring rules for behavior that are age appropriate and
positive; structuring group times for success; and structuring
transition times (Abraham et al. 1993, p. 93-105). When adults
respond quickly and directly to children's needs, they are helping
children build trust. ECE teachers also provide varied opportunities
to communicate, and they facilitate successful completion of tasks
while also allowing children to learn from their mistakes. They
facilitate development of self-esteem by respecting, accepting, and
comforting children. They facilitate development of self-control in
children through appropriate discipline, not punishment, and adults
plan for the increasing independence as children gain new skills (Bredekamp,
1987, p. 9-12).
The
classroom environment is structured to support the young children’s
learning. The classroom is arranged into learning areas, with
materials stored at children's level so they can begin play and
clean up as independently as they can. Activity areas facilitate
interaction with others. The emphasis is on child-initiated play,
with the teacher guiding the child through play experiences that
he/she has chosen. Learning areas help children to organize and
direct their thoughts and actions, and to make plans and carry
through. Areas include: blocks, dramatic play, art, quiet area,
discovery area, sand and water, construction, and an outdoor area
(Abraham et al. 1993). The classroom environment is organized to
support exploration, discovery, choice, active manipulation, and
self-initiated exploration. The daily routine is predictable,
consistent, and comfortable.
ECE
environments are highly structured and organized, which teachers
have carefully prepared and planned for. Teachers are in control of
the environment, not of controlling the learners; children are
actively involved and allowed to take responsibility for their
learning (Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992). Children's learning begins
in awareness, moves to exploration, then inquiry, and finally to
utilization (Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992) – much like the
experiential learning cycle. This whole-child philosophy and
child-centered approach supports this development. Play is seen as a
process, not about results. Through play children internalize the
world and make sense of it. Thought and imagination begin as a
dialogue with another person (Bruner, 1991).
Teachers
also participate in the assessment of the children. Assessments are
used for instructional planning, to identify those who need more
help or have special needs, for program evaluation, and to help
maintain accountability (Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992). Assessment is
done through observation, anecdotal records (notes of what has
happened, for example, “04/24 – Jake demonstrated time concept when
he said ‘When I get taller my wife’s favorite will be Minnie
Mouse’), and portfolios (collections of artwork to keep track of
progress). These are used to adequately plan future lessons, themes,
and skill-based activities.
Just as
NFE uses active learning, so also does ECE. Ingredients of active
learning include: child’s choice, materials for various use,
child’s manipulation of materials and situations, language, and
adult recognition and encouragement of child’s problem-solving and
creativity (Brickman & Taylor, 1991). Benefits of active learning
include: giving a choice guarantees the children’s interest; the
children gain self-confidence (no right ways and wrong ways, just
problems to be solved); and as they become decision makers and
problem solvers, they develop independence (Brickman, & Taylor,
1991).
Following
is a brief summary of the key experiences that are used in an ECE
program to support the areas of development.
KEY EXPERIENCES
Active Learning (Participatory Learning)
Using Language (Dialogue)
-
Talking with others
-
Describing events, objects,
relations
-
Expressing feelings in words
-
Own words written down and read back
-
Having fun with language
Representing Experiences and Ideas
-
Recognizing objects by sight, sound,
smell, feel, taste
-
Imitating actions
-
Relating pictures etc to real places
and things.
-
Role playing and pretending.
-
Making models
-
Drawing and painting.
Developing Logical Reasoning
- Classification - labeling, sort,
match, same, different, using and describing something several ways,
using more than one attribute at a time.
- Seriation - comparing, arranging in
order.
- Number - comparing number and
amount, number of items in two sets, counting by rote, one-to-one
co-correspondence.
Understanding Time And Space
-Spatial relations- fitting together
and taking apart, changing positions of things and observing
difference, direction of movement, relative distances, one's own
body in relation to space.
-Time - planning and completing what
one has planed, describing past events, anticipating future events,
starting and stopping action on signal, order of events, rates of
movement, simple time units, comparing simple time periods,
observing clocks, calendars, and seasons. (Hohmann,
Banet, & Weikart, 1979, pp. 3-6).
Comparing
NFE and ECE: A Case Example
The High/Scope
Curriculum was designed as a result of an ongoing process in the late
1960s-early 1970s in Ypsilanti, Michigan. The essence of High/Scope is
how adults interact with children. Adults are responsive and
supportive of children's learning and actions, they follow the
children’s interests, share control with the children, and are attuned
to the children's level of understanding (Brickman, & Taylor, 1991).
The classroom is
structured to follow DAP. There is a consistent daily routine every
day so children can learn to expect what will happen and anticipate
what will be next. While the arrangement of the routine is up to each
teacher and what works best for each particular class, each routine
includes the following:
1.
Circle Time or Group Meeting –
includes good morning, songs, stories, group games, and
reviewing
the daily schedule.
2. Plan-Do-Review (P-D-R)
-
Planning Time – children choose which
learning area they would like to play in; they plan what they will
do and with who and what materials.
-
Work Time – also called Do; this is
when children implement their plans and play in the learning centers
with teachers providing support.
-
Clean-Up Time
-
Recall (Review) Time – children recall
and review what they did. This allows them practice in reflecting on
their actions and what happened.
3. Snack
4. Small Group – more structured
activities are often planned.
5. Outside Time – to support gross motor
development (Hohmann, et al. 1979).
This schedule
demonstrates respect for the children’s interests and developmental
needs while still providing structure for classroom management, which
is a key design balance in NFE. The environment is rich in materials
and opportunities for children to make a choice. Teachers model how to
interact with materials and other people. Active learning – learning
that is initiated by the child and carried out by him/her – is
supported by allowing children to engage and explore what they are
interested in (Hohmann, et al. 1979).
The
Plan-Do-Review part of the day is in some ways the most important
(though some children would say it is snack). Planning time helps
children see they can make things happen for themselves (Brickman &
Taylor, 1991). It helps them develop an understanding of time; develop
language skills; and gives them opportunities to acknowledge and use
their own moods and feelings in constructive ways (Brickman, & Taylor,
1991). Recall time encourages the process of looking back to become
more natural. It allows children to review their experiences and gives
them opportunities to initiate and reflect on their actions. This
reflection is important for later learning.
The
classroom environment in High/Scope is set up with well-defined
learning areas. Materials that are open-ended and which can be used
for many purposes are included in each area. These materials are
stored in the reach of children and in easy to see containers; this
allows children to decide, use, and clean up independently. All
shelves and materials are labeled so children can match objects to
pictures and be as independent in their cleanup as they are in their
play (Hohmann et al. 1979).
The
teachers’ role in the High/Scope classroom is to facilitate children's
plans. They recognize and support each child’s work. They help
children extend their plans and ideas. Teachers also help children
deal with conflicts, or when they want to change their plans. As we
have compared NFE and ECE, we can see that many of the techniques and
principles of NFE are practiced in the High/Scope ECE classroom.
To continue
our comparison, many writings on NFE describe programs using the same
language that is used to discuss ECE. For example, Boudin (1993),
while describing an NFE program with women, noted that the women
involved began to take risks because they were no longer afraid to.
Participating in NFE had given them the confidence to be active in
their situation. The program itself was described as being
meaning-driven and problem posing, using a whole-language approach) to
analyze the participants’ experiences (Boudin, 1993). The use of peer
learners, where everyone learns from each other, was a concept valued
in the NFE program. To compare, the whole-language approach is similar
to the holistic approach of ECE. Analyzing the adult learners’
experiences parallels the Plan, Do, and Review technique of reflecting
on one’s actions. In ECE, children are supported and encouraged to
try; they play together and learn from each other just like the use of
peer learners in NFE. The problem-posing approach in NFE encompasses
ECE; everything is a problem for children to find the solution.
NFE
programs set up the learning environment to facilitate interaction and
communication. This includes arranging seating so both participants
and teachers are sitting together in a circle rather than rows of
seats with the teacher in the front. This technique supports the idea
that teachers and participants are all equal, in a sharing
relationship where all can learn something and teach something. Within
ECE, teachers sit on the floor with children, interacting and playing
with them at the children’s level. In both programs, the learners are
shown respect for their participation.
When
discussing community health education, Werner and Bower (1982) discuss
ways to help participants gain greater control over their own health
and lives. To support this, teachers need to adapt to the people's
traditional ways of learning - what they are used to and enjoy. In ECE,
teachers know that children learn through play, so they adapt and
provide learning experiences through fun activities and a play
environment.
Werner and
Bower (1982) also discuss the need to adapt each course to meet the
experience and needs of each new group of students; the participants
themselves can do some of the course planning. In ECE, each class
(and individual child) is different, so teachers need to plan
activities and materials appropriately. Children can help plan; use
what they are interested in for themes and units (for example,
dinosaurs, farms, zoo, my family). The more involved the learner is
(whether and adult or young child), the more equal, interested, and
relevant the program will be.
Other
concepts are also similar between NFE and ECE. Once a child masters a
concept, then teachers can then teach them what the concept is called
(for example, size or position words), but learning the label alone
does not mean that they understand the concept (Hohmann, et al. 1979).
Relating to NFE, adults also learn better when they have an
understanding of the concepts being taught. For example, literacy
programs are more successful when the words and topics being explored
are interesting to the learners (exploring health-related words with a
community interested in health care), and when learners understand the
concepts the words symbolize. ECE teachers model appropriate behavior
and play experiences for the children, just like NFE teachers use
methods and techniques which they want participants to continue using.
When I look
back at Knowles’ comparison of pedagogy and andragogy, it is easy to
conclude that both NFE and ECE fall into the andragogical model. Most
adults don’t realize that many of the techniques, active materials,
and principles that they are using are the same as what preschool
children are experiencing. I find it ironic that learning experiences
at both ends of life are so similar, while learning during the school
years has become more restrictive and focused on the end products of
test scores and grades. It is a shame that during the school age years
this process of learning has often been forgotten.
References
Abraham, M.R.,
Morris, L.M., & Wald, P.J. (1993). Inclusive Early Childhood
Education: A
model classroom. Arizona: Communication Skill Builders.
Ahern, T. (From reader 2). Literacy for
empowerment: A peasant farmer's experience in Central America.
Global Perspectives.
Bock, J. C., & Papagiannis, G. J.(Eds.).Nonformal
education and national development: A critical assessment of policy,
research, and practice. NY: Preager Special Studies.
Bopp, M. (1994). The illusive essential:
Evaluating participation in non-formal education and community
development processes. Convergence, XXVII,(1), 23-45.
International Council for Adult Education.
Boudin, K. (1993). Participatory
literacy education behind bars: Aids opens the door. Harvard
Educational Review, 63,(2), 207-232.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987).
Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs
serving children from birth through age 8: Expanded edition.
Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young
Children.
Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.).
(1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment
for young children, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: National Association
for the Education of Young Children.
Brickman, N. A., & Taylor, L. S.(Eds.).
(1991). Supporting young learners: Ideas for preschool and day care
providers. Ypsilanti, Michigan: High/Scope Press.
Brookfield, S. (1991). Andragogy:
Alternative interpretations and applications. In S. Merriam, & P.
Cunningham (Eds.), Handbook of Adult and continuing education
(pp.90-122). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bruner, J. (1991). Play, thought, and
language. In N. Lauter-Klatell, Readings in child development
(pp 76-81).CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
Cromley, J. (2000). Learning to
think, learning to learn: What the science of thinking and learning
has to offer adult education. NIFL Literacy Leader Fellowship
Program Reports, IV, (1).
Cumming, J. A. (1994). Critical Games.
Amherst, Mass: Center for International Education.
Dworetzky, J. P. (1990). Introduction
to child development, Fourth edition. St. Paul, MN: West
Publishing Co.
Ewert, D. M. (1989). Adult education and
international development. Handbook of adult and continuing
education (pp.84-97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hohmann, M., Banet, B., & Weikart, D. P.
(1979). Young children in action. Ypsilanti, Michigan:
High/Scope Press.
Horton, M. (1990).
The long haul: An autobiography. NY: Anchor Books.
Kagan, J., & Greenspan, S. I. (1991).
Milestones of development: A dialogue. In N. Lauter-Klatell,
Readings in child development (pp. 15-20). CA: Mayfield Publishing
Co.
Kane, E. (2001). A taste of
participatory learning and action. Unpublished manuscript.
Knowles, M. S. (1985). Andragogy in
action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
La Belle, T. J. (1986). Nonformal
education in Latin America and the Caribbean: Stability, reform, or
revolution? Westport, New York: Preager.
Participatory learning and action (PLA)
notes: Participation, literacy, and empowerment. (1998).
International institute for environment and development, 32.
Scherer, M. (1991). How many ways is a
child intelligent? An interview with Howard Gardner. In N.
Lauter-Klatell, Readings in child development(pp 21-25). CA:
Mayfield Publishing Co.
Skinner, B.F. (1991). Baby in a box. In
N. Lauter-Klatell, Readings in child development (pp. 4-8). CA:
Mayfield Publishing Co.
Torres, C. A. (1990). The politics of
non-formal education in Latin America. Westport, New York: Praeger.
Werner, D. & Bower, B. (1982).
Helping health workers learn. Palo Alto, CA: Hesperian Foundation.
|